Roland, Re-Reading, & Recommended

“The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.”

And so begins the epic tale of The Dark Tower.  Maybe it’s just because I like the story so much, but I think that opening line is one of the best of all time.  It’s probably just because it gets me thinking about all there is to come in this monumental epic.

For those of you who don’t know, The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger (which will heretofore be referred to simply as The Gunslinger) is the first in an epic 8 book series.  This series, which King wanted to be his “Lord of the Rings” is the tale of Roland, the last Gunslinger, and his journey to find The Dark Tower.  The series is so big, it actually even ties in to several of King’s other stories, which is pretty cool.  The series originally ended with book 7, but King felt that he still had stories to tell, and went back and added an 8^th book which just came out this year.  From what I understand, this new book is essentially just back stories which will have no real effect on the overall main story, just provide some more information, and actually takes place between book 4 and 5.

I think the hardest thing for me to do with reviewing all of The Dark Tower books will be to just focus on the book at hand.  Once you’ve read them before, it’s always impossible not to think about the future books when re-reading them.  Especially as you start to notice things that foreshadow future events.  Things you miss the first time around because you don’t know what those future events are going to be.  So it’s going to be very hard for me not to think about those things. 

In fact, I think it would almost be silly to try.  Part of the enjoyment of this journey is to write about all my experiences while reading and many of those experiences are going to be “second reading” experiences.  I will try to be sensitive to those of you who may not have read these wonderful books before (and if you haven’t, you really need to check them out, especially if you are a Stephen King fan… umm….err… *cough* Ellie!! *cough*).  But at the same time, for those of you who have read this series, I think this will be a great chance for me to share with you some of the things I’m noticing that you (and I) may have missed the first time around.  I think it would be a disservice for me not to do that as well. 

And let me just put it out here now, this post will contain spoilers.  Not just spoilers for The Gunslinger, but possibly for the entire series as well.  I will do my best not to give warnings before any major spoilers, but just know that due to the nature of these books, in order to be able to share my complete feelings about them, I will have to share some plot points.  If this concerns you, I do apologize, and would just say go read the books, then come back and read my thoughts.

This was my fourth time reading The Gunslinger; so needless to say, I knew the story pretty well.  That did not change my enjoyment of it one little bit though.  It’s hard to choose one book out of a series that is all connected and label it as your favorite.  Especially when all of the books connect and flow so well together the way The Dark Tower books do.  That being said, The Gunslinger is probably not my favorite in the series, but it would be high on the list.  This is the book were we get to meet Roland for the first time.  We don’t learn a whole lot about him here, and we don’t learn a whole lot about his ultimate quest, but we do learn one thing; Roland is awesome (the scene in Tull when he takes out the entire town is absolutely epic).  In fact, Roland just may be my second favorite character of all time (Dr. House is, and will always be, my favorite).

Despite this being my fourth read though, in some ways it was brand new to me.  This is because this is the first time I’ve been privileged to read the original version of The Gunslinger.  Back in 2003, when King finally got around to finishing the final three books of the series after recovering from his accident (something that I will discuss later on in the journey; for those of you who have no idea what I’m talking about, let’s just say we are very, very lucky we even have an ending to this epic story), he decided to go back and revise The Gunslinger in order to clean up some of the inconsistencies that occurred as the story evolved.  These inconsistencies arose because King’s style of writing is to not have an outline and rather just let the story flow out of him as he goes.  That approach, and the fact that he started The Gunslinger when he was very young and took over 12 years to fully finish it, led to quite a few “changes” in some of the details over the later course of the series.  To correct this King published a “Revised and Expanded” version of The Gunslinger, and this is the only version I had ever read.

That being said, I am going to do my best to focus on just the original version for this review and save any comparisons of the two until I re-read the revised version later on in the journey.  Although, there may be a few necessary comparisons to be made now depending on how they pertain to my thoughts on the original version.  We shall see.

I mentioned that The Gunslinger itself took King over 12 years to write.  It’s important that you understand that I’m talking about just The Gunslinger, and not the whole Dark Tower series.  Just this first book took him 12 years to write.  And that’s pretty interesting when you consider that it is the shortest of all of the books in the series (I think it’s even shorter than the newest one).  Of course “short” for Stephen King is probably about normal book length for many other authors 🙂

Back to the 12 year writing period though.  Knowing that going in this time, and knowing that this was not the “revised” version, I could definitely tell that the early part of the book was written by a young, inexperienced writer.  You can just tell that the end product is just a little rough and unpolished.  It’s choppy and rough and just doesn’t have the usual finesse that King’s writing usually does.  And while this is noticeable while reading, it doesn’t make the story any less enjoyable.  In fact, I think that speaks to just how good this story is; even the noticeably poorer writing does not take away from it.  However, by the end of the book, the writing has definitely improved.  I think what’s interesting about this is that there isn’t any one point where you can say, “Yes, right here.  This is where the writing stops being bad.”  Part of this is due to the fact that by the time you reach that point, you are so engrossed in the story that the quality of the writing is the last thing you are thinking about.  The other part of that is probably due to the fact that the book is broken into 5 distinct sections.  Each of these sections was written at a different point in King’s life, and he actually lets us know which was written when in short afterword at the end of the book.  He tells us what part he wrote just after finishing ‘Salem’s Lot, and which part he finished after The Shining.  So in some sense, if you wanted, you could say that after a particular section the writing gets better.  But as I said, by that point you aren’t really thinking about it.

Another interesting fact is that these 5 sections were originally published one at a time as individual (albeit connected and continuing) stories in a magazine.  They were only later collected and published all together as an actual novel.  And this is also apparent because each “section” contains is own little self-contained story that has a beginning, middle, and end with only the briefest thread of connection to the stories that came before it (oh, but what an important thread it is).  It’s interesting to read something that was originally written as 5 different stories.  Yes they all connect and flow together, and you could just think of them as 5 chapters.  But, when you are writing something that will be read by itself, it has to be able to stand on its own as well.  Obviously, if you just read section 3, you’d be pretty confused as to what is going on and who the characters are, but if you could get over that, then the story would hold its own… for the most part.

As you may remember from my last couple posts on Roadwork and The Running Man, I’ve been a little obsessed with the main character’s names and how they are used.  Maybe obsessed isn’t the right word, but I’ve made comments about them.  So I found it quite interesting while reading The Gunslinger that the main character himself does not have his name revealed until page 126!  It was a little weird at first, knowing what his name is and not seeing it used at all.  In fact, Roland’s name isn’t used at all in the first story in the book.  He is simply referred to as “The Gunslinger”.  And when his name is finally mentioned, it is completely out of the blue.  It’s not in a dialogue where he is introducing himself or anything like that.  It is merely in a descriptive sentence where “he” could have been used just as easily.  In fact, if “he” had been used it almost would have been better because for someone who has never read the story before to be reading along and all of a sudden they read “and then Roland took the skull” they have to stop and ask themselves “Wait, who is Roland?”

And then Roland’s name isn’t used again until page 134 in a flashback story.  Where again, if you didn’t “know” that Roland was the gunslinger, it might be a little confusing to be reading this backstory about a young boy named Roland and his friend Cuthbert and not really being sure which one of them is going to turn out to be “The Gunslinger” that you have been reading about to this point.  Perhaps that’s the reason for the use of Roland’s name on page 126… but I doubt that.  Anyway, for me it was more of just an interesting thing to notice than it was anything that caused any confusion.  But I did find it interesting.

Along with that, there is no mention of The Dark Tower itself until page 111.  You know, the tower that the whole series is named after.  Yeah, that tower.  Not mentioned until a third of the way though the book (of course, it’s still mentioned before we find out the name of the main character).  And really, we don’t find out much about the tower at all in this book.  We don’t even really find out much about Roland’s whole quest until the end of the book.  And even then we just find out a little bit.  As far as we are concerned for the majority of this book, Roland is simply trying to catch the Man in Black.  And that is part of the reason why this book is so captivating.  We know he is chasing the Man in Black, but we have no idea why, so we keep reading in the hopes that we will find out.  You may have noticed that I didn’t give my usual story synopsis with this book.  And that is because I think the opening line (see above) tells you all you really need to know about this book.  The Man in Black is fleeing across the desert, and the Gunslinger is following.  Everything else is really just details.  And for details, you really should read the book yourself 🙂

Ok, so those are the big long things I wanted to talk about.  The next couple things will just be short things I found somewhat interesting as I was reading.  Again, I may reveal more story details as they pertain to these items.  But some of these just may not make sense if you haven’t read the book.

In one of the flashbacks, Roland finds out about a plan by “The Good Man” to annihilate everyone living in the town of Farson.  The only reason this is really all that interesting is if you’ve read the series before, you will know that in book number 4 we first meet “The Good Man” and find out his name is John Farson.

The next thing that I thought was incredibly funny was during the flashback scene where Roland must prove his readiness for manhood by fighting his mentor, Cort.  At the end, when Roland has won, he grabs a key from Cort and has to resist the urge to “thrust it up to the sky in victory”.  Again, this is only interesting to you if you are a fan of Zelda.  I also find it interesting that this book was published in 1982, and Zelda didn’t come around until 1986, so clearly King is not emulating this is anyway, but that is sure the image that it brought up in my mind 🙂  Maybe Shigeru Miyamoto had read The Gunslinger, and these scene stuck out to him when creating The Legend of Zelda.

Ok, last thing of interest here.  This one will probably give some stuff away.  So sorry for that.  This one will probably also require some knowledge of the series to fully understand, so sorry for that too.  Ok, ready?  Here we go.

I was always under the impression that the Man in Black, who we eventually find out is named Walter, and Marten (a person from Roland’s past who we only find out the briefest about in this book but learn more later) were the same person.  However, at the end of this book, the Man in Black makes it very, very clear that he is not Marten.  He makes a comment about how impressed he is at what Roland has done (chasing him down over the course of 12 years) and says that Marten never could have done that.  He then later says that he worked though Marten, but again indicates pretty clearly that he is a separate entity.  And still later when Roland finally figures out that the Man in Black is Walter, Roland himself recognizes that he (Walter) had worked with Marten, still further solidifying the separateness of the two.

Now, before those of you who have read the books before (Amanda, Joe, Kathy, and anyone else) start getting all upset at me and yelling at me insisting that Walter is Marten and blah blah blah…. Keep in mind one thing.  This is the original version of the story, not the revised version from 2003.  I fully expect to have a lot more to say about this subject when I finish reading the new version 🙂

But for now, just accept that fact that Walter is not Marten.  There is no ambiguity at all.  It is very clear that these two characters are separate.  That was kind of a head turner for me when I read.  Because for 3 different readings of the series, I was always under the impression they were the same (again, for good reasons which will be discussed later).  But it’s interesting to see that at the very beginning, it is clear they are different.

And that’s about all I have to share with you about The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger.  The book is a nice quick read, so if you haven’t read it yet I would highly suggest that you do.  It’s really good.  Of course, be warned, this book is short and a fast read, but it will get you hooked.  You will want to find out what happens to Roland on his journey (because there is definite set up at the end for the next one), and his journey is not short.  The second book is significantly longer than this one; the third is even longer, the fourth longer still.  I’m pretty sure the fifth book is longer than the fourth, and the seventh is the longest of them all (disappointedly, King broke his cycle with the 6^th book, as it was shorter than both the 5^th and 4^th).  So, while this series is great and well worth the read, just be warned, it’s a long one.  But it’s oh so worth it.

And if you need any further encouragement to try this series out, let me again give you the hook that starts it all…

“The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.”

*Chills*

Thank you for reading.

Arnold, Acting, & Accents

The Running Man arrived this week, again, and without any dents, cracks, or scratches this time. 

Let’s jump right in shall we?

 

The Running Man (1987)

Oh man, where do I start?  I suppose at the risk of beating a dead horse, I can say that the movie was at least better than Trucks.  And actually, I suppose if I was just watching the movie and had nothing to go off of, it might have been a little more enjoyable.  Maybe.  But as far as saying that this movie is loosely based on the book, loose would be a definite understatement.

I suppose rather than try to list everything that was different; I should just start with listing the things that were the same.

They idea of the dystopian future America where the economy is ruined is the same.  The main character’s name (Ben Richards) is the same.  The name of the show he winds up on, The Running Man, is the same.  And that is pretty much where the similarities stop.

While I won’t list every difference, there are some major ones I should point out.  First of all, Ben Richards is not a down on his luck everyman in this movie.  He is actually an ex-police officer who has just broken out of jail.  Richards was put in jail because he would not follow orders and fire on an unarmed crowed of protesters.  Ironically, upon his escape, he is listed on the news as a fugitive who was in jail for shamelessly gunning down an innocent unarmed group of protestors…. 

The other major notable difference is with The Running Man show itself.  In the book it involved running away from the “hunters” and the contestants were free to travel all over the world.  Basically, they were set loose, given a head start, and then had to see how long they could survive in the world (with the deck stacked against them of course).  In the movie, the show involved placing the contestants inside an arena (a very large arena, but still a limited space) where they had to get through each of 4 different quadrants within 3 hours while being chased by the “stalkers”.  Quite the different premise indeed.

Now that I’ve discussed the differences that bear mentioning, I’d like to just talk about the movie for a little bit on its own.

The movie was…. Ok.  It was your typical 80s action flick set in a tattered futuristic America movie.  And by that I mean it was full of lackluster acting, cheesy puns and one-liners, and of course, 80s attire.  As my wife pointed out, it’s always interesting watching movies from the 80s that are supposed to be set “in the future” because the feeling you get from them is never a “futuristic” feel, but always a “yep, this is an 80s movie” feel.  Although, I’m sure 20 years from now they will say the same thing about today’s movies.  Although, there seems to just be something about the 80s that is just so…… 80s… that I don’t think any other era really captures quite the same.

As far as the acting goes, as much as I love Arnold Schwarzenegger (who plays Ben Richards), he was definitely not chosen for his acting ability (as is typically the case with Schwarzenegger films from this period).  It seems that at the time period, Arnold was typically cast for his body, and his ability to deliver those cheesy one-liners in his thick Austrian accent.  The rest of the acting in the movie was also pretty mediocre.  Actually, the best performance, I felt, came from the TV show host, Killian, who was played by Richard Dawson.  Dawson, if you don’t know, was the original host of Family Feud, so he was very much in his element as the host of The Running Man.  He even got in a few of his Feud trademark sayings during the movie.  Even outside of hosting the show, I enjoyed Dawson’s portrayal of Killian very much.  Speaking of trademarks… I definitely had to hold my hand to my head and sigh when at one point Richards turned to Killian and said “Killian, I’ll be back”.  Yep…. They went there….

I was also disappointed we didn’t get to see more of the other shows that were mentioned in the book.  In fact, we didn’t get to see any of the ones mentioned in the book, and we only got the briefest glimpse of one other show.  We got to see a brief shot of Climbing for Cash (or Bucks, or something like that).  The show involved a guy climbing a rope with packets of money stuck to it, as he reached the money he had to stick it in his shirt, or to his body somehow, all the while he has a pack of Dobermans nipping at his heels.  I think there was a big missed opportunity to not explore any other type of shows.  In fact, until the point we saw the blurb of Climbing for Cash, I had the feeling that the only show in the movie version of this world was The Running Man.  So, in that light, I’m glad they at least at one other one that was mentioned, but I would have like to see more.

Overall I would say I was mostly disappointed with The Running Man.  I felt that the book itself would have made for a very interesting movie.  Unfortunately this was not that movie.  I would love to see someone today try to make a movie that follows the book better, as I think it would be a very exciting movie. 

One last fact.  At the time this movie was made, it still wasn’t known that King was Bachman.  So the opening credits say “Based on the novel by Richard Bachman”, and none of the producers or directors knew that the book was really written by Stephen King.

 

And that’s all I have for you.  I’m making decent progress though The Gunslinger, so I should be back fairly soon with my review of that.

 

As always, thank you for reading.

 

Richards, Running, & Rentals

Well, I have finally finished The Running Man. I say this not because it took me a particularly long time (3-4 weeks isn’t so bad when you look at how long some of the books have taken me… *cough* The Stand *cough*), but because I flew through the first 200 pages or so in a couple of days and it has taken me 3 weeks to finish the last 100 or so. I have a fantastic reason for this of course. I started the book over the weekend that Amanda was admitted to the hospital to induce labor. Since she spent 2 days in labor before they finally decided to do a C-section and since there wasn’t a whole lot I was able to do while in the hospital with her, I was able to get a good chunk of reading done. At one point I thought I might just even be able to finish the book. I did not, however, and once our baby arrived, I was just a tad busy the next couple weeks getting used to being a parent and stuff and reading took a back seat. But, things are starting to get somewhat back to normal now (or at least, what normal is now going to be) and I am figuring out just how to get reading back into my schedule. Good thing too, because there are quite a few books to go on this journey and I am definitely enjoying myself and would hate to quit.
So let’s jump right on in shall we?

For those of you who don’t know what The Running Man is about, it takes place in a futuristic America in which a giant television network seems to have taken over the country. This book has a very strong science-fiction/futuristic vibe to it, and as such a lot of things aren’t really explained. You just kind of have to pick things up with the story as it goes. In some sense, this is nice for this story, as the action is really all that is important anyway. Anyway, the network has developed a whole series of “reality programs” for poor people to participate in, in order to win money. For example, one of these shows places people with poor hearts on a treadmill and they run and earn money based on how far they go. The appeal of the show for the “viewers” is of course what would draw anyone to any of the idiotic reality shows they have today… Seeing someone else in crisis is apparently very appealing (interesting how King was able to pick up on this fact several years before reality TV really took off, or even existed). And of course, the twist is that someone with a heart condition is going to have some issues after running on a treadmill for any length of time.
The book follows a man by the name of Ben Richards. Richards is down on his luck and applies to be on one of the shows. He gets selected to be on the network’s premier prime time show The Running Man. The premise of the show is that after a day’s head start, Richards will be hunted down by the networks top mercenary and his team. The prize is that for every hour Richards is able to evade capture, his family will receive $100 (I say his family because when Richards is “caught” he will be executed. So, as you can see, this book is very much a futuristic take on The Most Dangerous Game). If Richards is somehow able to survive for a month, he will win the ultimate prize of one billion dollars.
Now, what makes running that much harder for Richards is that, in addition to avoiding the “hunters”, he is also competing with every single viewer of the show. This is because any viewer who submits a tip to help find Richards receives a prize as well. And if that tip leads to his execution, the prize value is increased. Also, Richards must make two tapes of himself everyday (think of the “confessional” times they have on reality shows now – once again, King hits the nail on the head before the nail is even there) and mail them in to the network to air on the program. If he does not, he will forfeit all prize money, but will still be hunted… Of course, as soon as he sends something via the mail, the network knows where he is. But the network “does not share this information with the Hunters”…. Of course they don’t….
And that is the basic premise of the story. We follow Richards as he tries to avoid capture. It doesn’t seem like much, and it isn’t really, but the story is very engaging and moves at a pretty rapid pace. Which was nice after the long, slow, drawn out story that was Roadwork. Another thing that was interesting about this book, and helped with the pacing I suppose, is that it was divided up into 101 short sections; I guess you could call them chapters… Each one was titled the same way, “…Minus ### and Counting…” where ### was a running countdown starting with 100 and ending with 0 (which is why there are 101 of them). With the page count being only a little over 300, you can imagine that these “chapters” would be very short indeed. The chapter thing was kind of neat, and was definitely a stark contrast to Cujo which had absolutely no chapters whatsoever.
Other things I found interesting about the book include:
The main character’s name is Ben Richards. Which I couldn’t help but notice (being the comic lover that I am) is a nice cross between Ben Grimm and Reed Richards (two of the members of the Fantastic Four). Whether or not this was intentional by King, or just a random coincidence, I do not know. But I found it kind of cool.
Another thing I liked was how there wasn’t a lot of (read: any) detail given as to how America got to be the way it was, or much detail given about the state of things at all. Rather little details and tidbits were given though out the story in an almost casual way that someone would mention something that was widely known. For instance, there are air cars. No explanation is given as to what exactly this means, but they seem to be a pretty standard form of transportation. There are “new dollars” and “old dollars”, with new dollars being apparently more valuable. Also, at one point it is mentioned that deer are extinct on the east coast, but no mention as to why or how or what caused that. And then of course there was the mention of the Seattle riots of 2005, wonder what those were about? The final thing I thought was crazy and showed just how strange this future America is was the mention of Nevada’s “Have-One-Kill-One” mandatory abortion law. Of course, as I said, there is no explanation as to what this means at all. It’s just mentioned. But one can only imagine what the law could say, and cringe at the thought of what could cause things in our country to take that sort of turn….

I mentioned earlier that the pacing of this story was in direct contrast to the pacing of Roadwork. The other contrast is with the main character, specifically his name. If you recall from my post about Roadwork, we don’t actually find out the main character’s name until about page 19 or so. In The Running Man, there is no questions about what the main character, Ben Richards, name is. It would be pretty hard to forget too, as it seemed that King used his actually name “Richards” when talking about him almost as much, if not more, than he used the word “He”. Imagine reading a book and every other time you see the word “He” being used to reference the main character, replace that with the character’s actual name. It wasn’t necessarily distracting or anything and it didn’t really change the way I read the book at all. I think I just noticed since I had just finished Roadwork where the character’s name was used so infrequently that it was very noticeable that the name was used A LOT this time around.

Well, those are my thoughts about The Running Man. I really enjoyed it quite a bit. It’s a very quick read. The short chapters help with that, but the book itself just reads fast, so I’d encourage you to check it out of you like futuristic stories, or anything like that. I don’t want say too much about the ending of the book, but there is one more thing I feel I want to mention because it goes hand in hand with King using the whole “reality TV” idea before it existed. So, SPOILER ALERT!!! If you are thinking of reading the book, you may want to avoid the rest of this paragraph. The book ended with a plane flying into the networks main building. Again, keep in mind this book was written 1982, well before the tragedy of September 11th, 2001. I only bring it up because I find it interesting to read books, watch movies, or anything like that that deal with subject matters that at the time wouldn’t cause any issues, but now a day would not be acceptable. I’m sure no one really thought anything about the ending of the book in 1982 other than “Wow, that’s intense” or something like that. But I’m sure today there would be a big hullaballoo if someone tried to include something like that in a book (that wasn’t based on or about the World Trade Center incident).

And that really is all I have to say about the book.
I was planning on being able to share my thoughts on the movie as well, as it arrived before I finished the book and has been sitting on my shelf waiting for me. However, when I went to stick it in on Sunday, I was amazed to find that the disc and a significant dent in it. Not a scratch. Not a crack. But an honest to goodness dent. Needless to say it would not even load in my player. So I reported it to Blockbuster and they are sending me a replacement which should be here Wednesday. I suppose I could have waited to post until after I had watched it, but I don’t know if I’ll get to it right away or not and I didn’t want all my thoughts to evaporate (as they tend to do). I’m still trying to figure out just exactly what could cause a “dent” in a DVD… Maybe I just don’t want to know. Regardless, it’s very clear that Blockbuster does not have inspecting their discs very high on their priority list before sending them out (unless this somehow occurred in transit). I did make the decision to keep moving on with my reading though, as I don’t want to risk stalling while I’m still on such a good roll (three-week delay excluded). So I started The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger last night. Not that it really matters that much to you what I’m doing or what order I’m doing it in… But I just thought I’d share.

I hope you have enjoyed my thoughts. As always, thanks for reading.

Roadwork, Richard, & Running

I finished Roadwork last night. I would say that I don’t have a lot to say about it, but it seems that every time I do say that I end up having a post a mile long. So instead I’ll just say I don’t know how much I’ll end up saying and leave it at that.

 

If you’ve never read Roadwork before, allow me to give you the briefest overview of what the book is about. The book follows a man by the name of Barton Dawes. The city where Bart lives has decided to add an extension to the freeway which will go right though Bart’s neighborhood. As a result, Bart (and the rest of his neighbors and several businesses, including the one where Bart works) is forced to relocate. Bart, however, does not accept this very well, and the book is about his slow mental breakdown as he struggles to keep his house.

Struggles is not really the right word though. What he really does is just flat out deny the reality of what is happening. He goes about his life pretending to everyone around him that he is doing what he is supposed to be doing. He tells his wife that he is looking into new houses, but always comes up with some excuse as to why he isn’t buying one yet (termites, not a good deal, etc.). He tells his boss that he is working on signing a new lease for their business to move into a new building, giving excuses as to why he is delaying and waiting until their option from the city runs out. But, the reality is that Bart is doing nothing. He is not looking at houses; he has no intention of that. He is not going to sign the new lease; he has no intention of that. In fact, it comes across that Bart really has no intention of doing anything. Well, eventually he has intentions of doing “something”, but I’ll let you read and discover what that is on your own. I will tell you this though, Bart’s inaction eventually cost him his job, his marriage, and one might say even his sanity (though one might also say that his sanity was gone to begin with, which is why he failed to act in the first place).

As always, I’ll get to my thoughts on the book closer to the end of my post, but first, here are a few things I found interesting about the book.

The first thing is that we don’t actually learn Bart’s name until page 19 of the book. For the first several pages, he is only referred to as “he” during the narrative sections of the book. I found this to be somewhat interesting. Reading so far into a book and getting somewhat “invested” is a little odd when you don’t even know the name of the person you are supposed to be invested in. I don’t know that this really had any overall effect on anything; I just found it to be interesting.

The second thing is we never actually find out where this story takes place. The name of the city is never mentioned, and neither is the name of the state. There are some implications as to this being somewhere probably in the middle of the country, but nothing is ever stated specifically. That being said, this marks the second book not to take place in Maine. However, Maine is mentioned a couple times, so the prize for the first book to not mention Maine at all is still up for grabs (yep, even Danse Macabre mentioned Maine, more than once. Danse doesn’t qualify as “not taking place” in Maine since it was non-fiction and didn’t really take place anywhere, but since it did mention Maine a couple times, I thought I’d share that with you).

Next up on the interesting list, Bart works in an industrial laundry. There is one point in the book where there is a brief mention of the folding machine nicknamed “The Mangler” (so called because of what it would do to you if you got caught in it). And of course, this is interesting because King wrote a short story called The Mangler about just such a machine (you can view my post about that story here if you need a refresher).

In relation to where Bart works, there comes a point in the story where Bart is told that had he not sabotaged his career he would have been on track for an executive vice president position which would have paid $35,000 a year. I only bring this up because I always find it fascinating to read older books and think about just how much has changed since the time they were written. Here we are with a guy potentially being offered an executive position with a salary that is smaller than what some people make in their starting positions now. And ultimately, this book isn’t even that old yet. Granted, it takes place a few years before it was actually published, but not that many. It’s just amazing to me sometimes how much in our society has changed so quickly.

The last thing I want to talk about that I found interesting is actually something I’ve talked about before. If you’ll remember from my post on Cujo, I talked about how the main character made a comment that if her situation had taken place in a book, someone would have come along to have helped them (which, and I didn’t mention this before as I only just thought of it, is a little ironical because the fact that it is a book is probably the only reason that all of the events that needed to happen actually did happen to leave her in that position….but I digress). Anyway, this book also pulled the “let’s specifically say something to try and make this more real only to call more attention to the fact that this really is a book” card. Twice!

The first was early on in the book when Bart is talking to someone and says something that didn’t quite come out the way he wanted it to and he makes the comment (or thought) that it’s “only in books that people say everything right the first time”. To which I make the same comment as I did before – that it’s only in books (or so it seems) that people make the comments about what only happens in books.

The second event was later on in the story, and was a little… different in delivery than these other two examples. Bart is talking to someone about his life and how things are going and he makes the comment that “I get the feeling I’m a character in some bad writer’s book”. HA HA. So now, not only are we pulling the “this is real not a book” card, but were also commenting on the author. What makes this kind of extra funny is that this is one of the books that King originally published under the name of Richard Bachman (I may have forgotten to mention that earlier, so there we go). So is this perhaps some subtle comment by King that, “Yes, I know this isn’t the best book I’ve done, deal with it”? Probably not, but the line made me smile nonetheless.

 

So there we have it friends. That is Roadwork. It is definitely not the greatest book you’ll ever read (if you chose to do so), but it is by no means the worst one either (so why not give a try?). It’s by no means a bad read, and I’d recommend it if you’re a King fan or you want something quick and easy. But don’t expect anything big to come from it. The story is pretty simple and the character development is pretty basic (I know, pretty shocking for King, right? But then again, this is “Bachman”, so…). I got the feeling at times that some of the character “relationships” were just included because they would be expected to be. I didn’t get a lot out of the interactions between Bart and his wife. I suppose part of that is to show just how distant the two have grown. So I suppose in that sense things worked just how they should, because the interactions between them felt forced and unnatural. But they felt that way in a very simplistic way, not in the way that you could tell the author was really trying to convey a sense of distance between the two, but rather in a way that almost conveyed a sense of “I don’t know what to do with these two, but they have to interact, so here.”

One thing I did appreciate about the book is that a little bit of time was taken to explain some of the reason why Bart reacted the way he did. It seems for a while that he is just going crazy for absolutely no reason, but we eventually learn part of the cause and it actually does create a little bit of sympathy for him. A little bit. There still really is no excuse for his actions. But learning the why at least lets us feel a little sorry for the guy, but just a little.

Over all I did enjoy the book. It wasn’t exactly gripping in any way and as I mentioned, a lot of the relationships felt superficial and forced. The writing certainly wasn’t King’s greatest, but you have to keep in mind this was an early work of his and there is likely a reason why he published it under the Bachman name instead of his own (I mean, he could have chosen not to publish it at all, and that would have been a loss. A small one, but a loss nonetheless). That being said, the book was still fun and enjoyable for me, even the second time around. The best part was probably the short little epilogue at the end where we find out that (SPOILER, if you’re worried about that type of thing. It’s only slight and doesn’t ultimately affect the overall story, so you should be good) the highway extension wasn’t even necessary. The city simply had some extra money it had to spend on building roads and so it decided to use it (so it wouldn’t lose it next year). Thus, Bart’s whole livelihood ended up being ruined simply because of the government machine. HA.

 

And that’s about all I have for Roadwork. Up next is The Running Man, which is also a Richard Bachman book. It’s a little shorter than Roadwork, so I may be back pretty quickly. Or we might have a new baby soon, in which case who knows how long it will take me to get back. Either way, I will be back at some point.

 

As always, thanks for reading.